Malvern
has a food bank. Words I never thought I would utter. While it is a phrase that
should gladden us – after all “You
can judge a society by how they treat their weakest
members” – we must ask why it is that Malvern needs a food bank.
This week we have learnt that more than 1,400 people (over 600 of whom were children) received emergency aid from our local food bank. Even our relatively prosperous
town is being hit by two pernicious philosophies that are leading to the
devastation of public services – and to the concept of ‘public service’.
First, we have “trickle-down”
economics – if we allow the richest in our society to become even wealthier (the household wealth of the top 10% is 100 times the
wealth of the poorest 10%), some of that wealth will, eventually, “trickle
down” to the least well-off. Feeding from the crumbs of the table of the rich
is no basis for a caring and just society. The rich rarely know when they have
enough and need to share. Successive governments of whatever persuasion have
not been inclined to encourage them to do so.
At the same time there is the
belief that the marketplace delivers
more cost-effective and better-quality services. Whether it is the NHS, higher
education, public utilities, transport – now the Royal Mail – history has taught
us that a marketplace of privatised
monopolies, where the short-term interests of shareholders are prioritised
ahead of the needs of citizens, is no guarantee of the quality or
cost-effectiveness of essential services.
Further we have the myth of
‘localism’ – government dressing up its disinclination to deliver essential
public services as an exercise in giving communities the ‘opportunity’ to take
on that burden – but without the resources and support to do so. Ever more
services once delivered by qualified professionals are now run by well-meaning,
but essentially amateur, volunteers, doing their best in the face of government
indifference.
I urge you not to give in to politicians of every hue seeking to turn us against the weakest in society, but to support the likes of the Food Bank. Let’s be thankful that we have those willing to step in when government abrogates its responsibilities. But it is no cause for celebration.
The 1930s was a time of soup kitchens and eighty years later we have food banks. Our public services services are in a dire state and that is because they are being deliberately run down rather than we 'cant afford them'. However, we do need to make some changes but privatization and starving them of funds is not the way. The Green House think has come up with some ideas in their Smaller But Better? report. It's worth a read. Check it out at: http://www.greenhousethinktank.org/files/greenhouse/home/Public_Services_inside_final.pdf
ReplyDelete